Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francis Fesmire

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, withdrawn. Although there is one negative vote besides the nominator's, I think WP:SNOW clearly applies. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:58, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Francis Fesmire

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Page Move: Page has been moved to Francis M. Fesmire during deletion discussion.

Keep This article is about a notable individual with thousands of Google hits. It needs cleanup and a more neutral tone. But I think this article should be kept. GauravGMa (talk) 14:52, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently notable, if barely, but article seems like spam. Not enough to G11, but too much to keep? Discussion needed, but I say delete. TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 14:23, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Seems to meet WP:ACAD, but probably could use a rewrite for tone VASterling (talk) 14:28, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Hagiographic spam. ukexpat (talk) 14:52, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep On the one hand, I don't think we specifically need to have articles for all of those who have Ig-nobel's, but in this case, the Ig-nobel doesn't seem to be the heart of the article. When I went to the find sources scholar link, I got over 100 hits, one of which is the actual formal article on which the Ig-nobel was Awarded.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Naraht (talk • contribs)
Keep: Definitely needs improvement, but the subject seems notable. I've tagged the page with {{Rescue}} and {{expert-subject}}. -- BenTels (talk) 15:17, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -- ukexpat (talk) 15:30, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- ukexpat (talk) 15:30, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This article has been nominated for rescue. BenTels (talk) 16:05, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If you search FM Fesmire on google scholar you get over 1000 hits. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tyfon9 (talk • contribs) 16:28, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Page has been moved by Tyfon9 to Francis M. Fesmire — TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 16:59, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Seems to pass WP:PROF. Has some coverage outside the Ig Nobel, including for being named a "Hero of Emergency Medicine".[1] Has an H-index of around 20, according to Google Scholar. Fences&Windows 19:16, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Clinical medicine is not a high-publication, high-citation biomedical field (like say neuroscience). Nevertheless, WoS shows this person has >70 publications with an h-index of 18 and with >900 cumulative citations. This is a conclusive pass on WP:PROF #1. Article may need fixing, but it's not a candidate for deletion. Respectfully, Agricola44 (talk) 20:45, 24 September 2010 (UTC).[reply]
Keep - Passes WP:PROF and WP:GNG. Needs major cleanup though. We certainly don't need a gargantuan list of every paper the guy has ever written. SnottyWong ^confer 23:21, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - easily passes the notability guidelines, per Snotty Wong. High h-index. AfD is not for cleanup. Bearian (talk) 21:46, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Nomination withdrawn by nominator, request close as speedy keep — Per Mene, Mene, Tekel u-Pharsin and snow. Regards, TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 18:30, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.