Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francis Ford Coppola Presents

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Francis Ford Coppola#Francis Ford Coppola Presents. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 01:24, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Francis Ford Coppola Presents

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Zero citations or sources in the article to indicate notability Nightscream (talk) 15:38, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 November 15. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:54, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Blank and Redirect to Francis_Ford_Coppola#Francis_Ford_Coppola_Presents It's already well covered in his main page, where it seems to belong. I don't see anything worth saving on this unsourced version. -- Bob drobbs (talk) 18:53, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Question Is a AfD even required to blank and redirect? Or could one of us be be bold, implement it, and close this discussion? -- Bob drobbs (talk) 18:54, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:25, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:25, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Squonky nom but the idea is right. This is probably one of my first articles for the project, before I knew much about sourcing and style. Lack of sourcing is not a good reason to delete a clearly notable subject. However, as User:Bob drobbs fairly notes, any notability of this Eponymous collection of lifestyle brands created and run by Coppola falls under the shadow of the individual brands, and his own bio where it is well covered. So it is better to merge any useful information, and then blank and redirect to the bio. no need to wait for an entire AfD for that. Whoever volunteers, I suggest a nonadmin closure after doing it. Cheers. – Wikidemon (talk) 00:56, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
1) I made the redirect (with page creator's support).

2) Did not see anything that needed to be merged.

3) Created a section on FFC's talk page informing people of the redirect.

4) I can't nonadmin close this as I'm involved. Anyone else want to do that? -- Bob drobbs (talk) 03:12, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I may close per IAR or WP:whatareyougoingtodoaboutit? Otherwise, probably low traffic at this point so it will just get closed without further fuss in due course. Thanks! - Wikidemon (talk) 09:44, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.