Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francis Sant-Cassia (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Consensus is that the article fails the notability guidelines. Davewild (talk) 18:25, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Francis Sant-Cassia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable "noble," created by the first in a currently unraveling string of sockpuppets going back some years. There is only one independent source for the information in this article [1], the others either being Wiki mirrors or sourced from maltagenealogy.com or maltesenobility.com, sites in the process of being spamblocked MediaWiki_talk:Spam-blacklist#maltagenealogy.com_and_saidvassallo.com, which fails WP:V RGTraynor 17:51, 20 November 2009 (UTC) RGTraynor 17:51, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:BIO due to a lack of multiple independent and reliable sources with significant coverage. Edison (talk) 18:35, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no notability established (not much verifiability either, but that's another matter).Bali ultimate (talk) 21:38, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. -- - 2/0 (cont.) 03:56, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The tiny number of Gnews hits shows the man existed, but he appears to have gotten minimal coverage even in the local papers. No sources back the more extravagant claims of the article or show that the subject has any notability whatsoever. Edward321 (talk) 15:11, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.