Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freddie Kissoon
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. The ikiroid (talk·desk·Advise me) 03:13, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A speedy deletion of this article on a Guayanese columnist was overturned at deletion review, but an AfD was called for since the assertion of notability still lacks sourcing. This is a procedural listing, I have no opinion. ~ trialsanderrors 00:08, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, a quick Google turns up [1] [2] [3] [4] and apparently he is notable enough to upset the president of Guyana [5]. Given the Google bias, that's probably just the tip of the iceberg. Demiurge 00:18, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep- per Demiurge--SUIT 01:19, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - faculty member and published columnist. Needs sources though. --Duke of Duchess Street 01:48, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Seems to be notable in his country, though sources would be helpful. Denni talk 02:10, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Quite notable, but tag the article as needing sources. --The Way 02:17, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Notable enough for Wikipedia. Alex43223 Talk | Contribs | E-mail 07:40, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Seems notable enough to keep. Hello32020 14:17, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, but add sources to avoid another AfD Alf photoman 16:51, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.