Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frequency (Khat Prodution album)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 23:45, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Frequency (Khat Prodution album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, no indication of notability, thereby failing WP:GNG and WP:NALBUM. WP:BEFORE check failed to bring up anything of note. Kirbanzo (userpage - talk - contribs) 19:32, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Kirbanzo (userpage - talk - contribs) 19:32, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Kirbanzo (userpage - talk - contribs) 19:32, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete or Speedy Delete per WP:A1 (no context or indication of importance) and/or WP:A9 (artist does not have an article). The artist, Khat Production, is barely present on the Internet in any language beyond a few basic social media pages, and this album is only noted in a few typical user-generated listings. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 20:34, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete since there does not appear to be enough coverage from reliable, third-party sources to meet WP:GNG requirements. I also agree with Doomsdayer520 that this seems to meet the criteria for a speedy delete per WP:A1. Aoba47 (talk) 00:26, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete as per WP:A9 (but not as per WP:A1 because it is not "lacking sufficient context to identify the subject" and A1 is not concerned with "indication of importance") or delete as per WP:GNG and WP:NALBUM. -Lopifalko (talk) 21:07, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for clarifying, I may have been thinking of an old definition of A1 that was changed sometime recently. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:20, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.