Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Günther C. Feigl

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 21:04, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Günther C. Feigl

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Needs third party coverage. Unclear notability. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:13, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:05, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:05, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No independent third party coverage and none likely to emerge in the foreseeable futures. (List of publications:[1] It's not super long for a medical researcher his age. Note that unless he appears first he didn't actually write the paper. If he appears last he did exactly nothing, it's just a routine honorary mention he receives because he's the boss of the working group.) Damvile (talk) 11:05, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Search result came up with nothing notable. Will see if there are sources available in different languages. Rzvas (talk) 18:08, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
delete per nominator's rationale--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 22:08, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.