Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G0v

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:45, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

G0v

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability concerns. Article is written as a first-person narrative and doesn't have independent references. power~enwiki (π, ν) 15:52, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki (π, ν) 15:52, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions. power~enwiki (π, ν) 15:52, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Clearly meets WP:GNG with articles in Medium, Wired, MIT Technology Review and CityMetric discussing them, among many others. And that's just the English-language literature. Bondegezou (talk) 13:45, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Meets the GNG per a source review. In addition to those presented above, here is another news source, and here (pp. 31–37) is a source from what appears to be a reliable periodical (Taiwan Panorama). Concerns about the article's tone can be addressed by copy editing it, or tagging it as needing attention for tone issues. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:25, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.