Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GIR (proxy voting)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. There does not seem to be much hope that draftifying would be of any use. Randykitty (talk) 17:27, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GIR (proxy voting)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not seem to have any significant coverage in reliable secondary sources Salimfadhley (talk) 23:02, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Salimfadhley (talk) 23:02, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 00:17, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify- Wikipedia does not accept promotional content. An article has to be written in neutral point of view and has to meet the notability guidelines too. It has improvement opportunities. So, it can be draftified. Mommmyy (talk) 18:51, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Curbon7 (talk) 05:09, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:30, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify: Per User:Mommyy. SoyokoAnis - talk 03:00, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete ~~Merge to IA Financial Group, the parent corp.~~ There is no sign of significant coverage of the subsidiary as an independent entity in the article or in searches. Draftifying would only make sense if there was a strong likelihood that an independently-sourced article could be created in line with notability guidelines, which does not appear to be the case. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 15:39, 9 November 2021 (UTC) updated per reference below by AllyD Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 15:41, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Although this company originated as a division of Demers Conseil, which has since become part of IA Financial Group, GIR appears to be privately owned [1], so the IA article wouldn't be a good merge target. AllyD (talk) 13:46, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Aside from routine coverage of their SHARE merger in 2020, the references in the article are tending to be items about individual or links to Corporate Knights reports in whose creation they were involved, falling under trivial coverage at WP:CORPDEPTH. Beyond that, searches are finding very little for GIR or SHARE. A company providing services, but fails WP:NCORP. AllyD (talk) 14:08, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.