Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaderypoluki
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:15, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
- Gaderypoluki (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There is no indication that this term exists in English; even the given reference doesn't use the term. The word exists in Polish, but it doesn't seem to be anything other than a cryptographic tool. Primefac (talk) 04:34, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:GNG. Heck, at this point, we can't even verify it exists. --Nick—Contact/Contribs 04:42, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - the fact that plwiki is the only other Wikipedia with this article means that this likely fails WP:GNG. sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 12:45, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:43, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - It does exist. There's even an app for it. However, definitely does not meet WP:GNG. At this point, Wiktionary is the better option. Onel5969 TT me 13:42, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.