Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gagarin: First in Space

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, withdrawn. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:11, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gagarin: First in Space

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Articles does not meet WP:NOTFILM for notability and does not have significant coverage in independent sources. The film has not been reviewed by anyone notable or been nominated or won an award and the film release has not had significant coverage. Cowlibob (talk) 16:28, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by nominator - as per the great work done below in finding sources which prove notability. Cowlibob (talk) 08:03, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:46, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:46, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Original Cyrillic:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Russian title:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Romanian title:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

German title:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Director:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Writer:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

English reviews?:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

STRONG Keep per meeting WP:NF... even if most of the many available sources are non-English. IE: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7] [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16],[17]... and many others. Their not being in English does not somehow equate to a non-notability. I encourage the nominator to consider WP:CSB, and WP:NONENG and mostly WP:NRVE to understand and accept that notability is found through an availability of sources and not upon their being used to cite an article... and I ask that he withdraw this very unnecessary AFD. Secondly Cowlibob, and with respects, if we have a meeting of WP:GNG (even if in non-English sources), we need not dip into WP:OEN. Note the entry at the Russian Wikipedia shows sources which could be translated. IE link to the Russian version of megacritic.com giving results for multiple critic reviews. WP:NF is easily met. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 23:23, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 03:12, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.