Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gallery of Jacobite consorts
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. A merge discussion on the article's talk page is encouraged. Regards, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 14:23, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Gallery of Jacobite consorts (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:NOTREPOSITORY, should be on Commons. —fetch·comms 01:33, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep because it can be expanded into an article with the existing content as part of it, or else merge into Jacobite succession. Ty 02:13, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep it relates to Jacobite succession and is valuable, merge if needs be...Modernist (talk) 04:53, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep or Merge it was created in the same manner of Gallery of Jacobite pretenders which was recently merged to Jacobite succession. I want to really know about others' opinion on these consorts' importance because I'm in a little doubtful about their actual importance. It seem foolish to mention a list of women/men who were titular consorts of pretenders. The role of consort is already near to nothing in an actual monarchy.--Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy (talk) 05:13, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Their political importance may or may not have been great, but the consideration for wikipedia is meeting WP:N, which presumably they do. It is part of the fabric of history. Ty 22:38, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Transwiki and soft redirect to Commons or merge and
deleteredirect to Jacobite succession. Armbrust Talk Contribs 16:10, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- You can't merge and delete. It has to be merge and redirect for GFDL continuity. Ty 22:36, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- You're right, my mistake. Armbrust Talk Contribs 23:24, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- You can't merge and delete. It has to be merge and redirect for GFDL continuity. Ty 22:36, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.