Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaming Nexus
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:26, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
- Gaming Nexus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It had no in-depth hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search. There are no worthwhile redirect targets. If someone finds more (non-English and offline) sources, please {{ping}} me. czar 17:10, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. czar 17:10, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - I was planning on getting around to nominate this for deletion myself so that's my vote. GamerPro64 18:02, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:51, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:51, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:51, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 14:35, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 14:35, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07 (T) 00:54, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07 (T) 00:54, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete for now and draft and userfy if needed at best as my searches clearly found signs of better coverage for a better notable article. Notifying tagger Rubbish computer in case they're not aware of this current AfD. SwisterTwister talk 22:49, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. -- ferret (talk) 00:16, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.