Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garment sewing data

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 10:23, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Garment sewing data

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It's an unsourced essay. Ad Orientem (talk) 13:16, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not quite, there is a list of refs as External links at the end, and one link to Birnbaum right in the text: clearly not ideal. It is somewhat essay-like, and also somewhat how-to. Delete and start over (WP:TNT) might be best, if indeed it's a worthwhile topic.

Oh my. The "(Kanawaty, 1992)" ref in the text made me wonder if ... and yes, we have a WP:COPYVIO from Towards sustainable labour costing in UK fashion retail. I will remove that one now: if there are others, further action(s) might be necessary. Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:01, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE as unsalvageable. I've removed the most blatant copyright violations; what's left isn't usable, being between quoting and essay, and probably not actually covering the subject. Let's start over. The editor needs some basic instruction in wiki-ways. Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:14, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per above. My sense it is a roundabout advertisement for SewEasy products featuring chunks of canned WP:REFSPAM. I did a google search with "Garment sewing data" in quotes, only got 6 pages, nothing newsworthy. Can I add that the article in its current form, particularly the lede paragraph, is confusing; it does not say exactly what garment sewing data is. What IS it? Whatever, does not seem to meet GNG.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 21:35, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:28, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:28, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:28, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.