Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gary Pease
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 08:31, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Gary Pease (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Not notable. SummerPhD (talk) 11:29, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 15:34, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless better references can be found. A Google News archive search turns up references to other people with this name, but the only reference to an actor by this name was in a list of actors in a stage play. -- Eastmain (talk) 15:34, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete If it could be a hoax, it's not an acceptable article on a living person. Hipocrite (talk) 19:11, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- A hoax? The link to the Internet Movie Database would show the person is real. Dream Focus 11:30, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I added a list of all of his television and film roles. All of his television appearances, have been for notable television shows. His total career makes him notable. Dream Focus 11:30, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - He does not meet any of the criteria under WP:ENT, all of the roles listed are clearly minor. In any case, that would only have established a presumption of notability. To actually be notable, we would need substantial coverage in independent reliable sources. IMDb is not a reliable source, so we have no coverage whatsoever in reliable sources. - SummerPhD (talk) 13:34, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Has anyone seen any of these episodes? Was his role in at least two of them significant? If so, he meets the criteria. Dream Focus 23:22, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - He does not meet any of the criteria under WP:ENT, all of the roles listed are clearly minor. In any case, that would only have established a presumption of notability. To actually be notable, we would need substantial coverage in independent reliable sources. IMDb is not a reliable source, so we have no coverage whatsoever in reliable sources. - SummerPhD (talk) 13:34, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete in the absence of any reliable sources that discuss this person (imdb seems to be it). As an actor, he has won no major awards or otherwise been recognized as making a significant contribution to his field. Fails bio.Bali ultimate (talk) 11:48, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - What we have is evidence he is a working actor, not evidence hat he is a notable actor. -- Whpq (talk) 15:14, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per BIO. Eusebeus (talk) 17:11, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Unless reliable independent sources appear we must delete for now. -- Banjeboi 23:57, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per nom, does not meet notability, need independent reliable sources. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 00:33, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Might be notable someday, but today isn't it. Niteshift36 (talk) 02:08, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.