Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gasp! (TV series)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:43, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gasp! (TV series)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable television series, no sources provided and failure of WP:GNG. Paul Vaurie (talk) 19:24, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Australia. Paul Vaurie (talk) 19:24, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - the only source is the author's own website. Paul Vaurie (talk) 19:25, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. I cannot find anything that would constitute a reliable, independent source covering this show. Searching notable Australian news outlets (e.g. ABC, 9News, the SMH, and The Age) specifically returns nothing. Even the article Terry Denton does not seem to have the sort of reliable, independent sourcing to warrant its existence under WP:BASIC, but I would have to do a more in-depth search to confirm or deny that. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 00:08, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@TheTechnician27, @Wizzleworker tried to improve the article, can you please review their edits? Yours sincerely, TechGeek105 (his talk page) 21:22, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, TechGeek105. I checked the article's sources, and they are now a potentially marginally notable magazine (IF), a random paragraph with no authorial credit from LicenseGlobal, a Facebook post, and the original citation from terrydenton.com. This still in no way even remotely meets notability guidelines. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 22:25, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I will try to add more references to that article, @TheTechnician27. Yours sincerely, TechGeek105 (his talk page) 22:47, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I found a reference from TV Tonight, about the show coming to the Nine Network (https://tvtonight.com.au/2011/02/airdate-gasp.html), and another reference from TV Tonight about the show coming to ABC3 (https://tvtonight.com.au/2011/08/airdate-gasp-2.html). Yours sincerely, TechGeek105 (his talk page) 22:54, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have added both references into the article, as well as adding a reference from the ABC iview website. Yours sincerely, TechGeek105 (his talk page) 23:27, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as a lot of editing has occurred since this article's nomination.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:59, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep reliable, independent source additions seem to now be enough for this article to meet WP:GNG and show that the series is notable. Happily888 (talk) 00:41, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Additional analysis of the newly added source material would be very helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 06:25, 26 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Exceptional third relist as we just need someone to comment on the sources added
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 03:35, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - notable per reliable sources . See in particular the if.com.au reference. @Spartaz

—A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 04:39, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The show is notable and the sources provided above meet WP:RS. FlutterDash344 (talk) 09:47, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.