Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gee and haw

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 02:19, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gee and haw

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not a dictionary. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 01:03, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 07:56, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, wiktionary has it covered --Cornellier (talk) 15:39, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 16:03, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.