Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gelbis
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Gelbis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The only online source for this custom is a WordPress blog that published a piece on this one month before the Wikipedia page was created. I cannot find any other sources for this custom. Tooncool64 (talk) 20:19, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Agree with nomination. Could find no source that would indicate the article is justified.Spiralwidget (talk) 20:30, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Somalia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:16, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: This also appears to be a name and a location... I can't find anything about a wedding ceremony. Unsourced article that doesn't show notability. Oaktree b (talk) 21:25, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Had previously tried to find this via google and the Somali wiki, and failed completely as well. Coeusin (talk) 13:28, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, I couldn't find sources that pass WP:GNG. Suonii180 (talk) 18:09, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
- 'Delete': not WP:N. Headhitter (talk) 07:35, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per above - and WP:MADEUP. Bearian (talk) 11:45, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- Merge (admins please relist) to Wedding customs by country#Somalia per WP:ATD. There isn't enough for WP:SIGCOV but this is a real thing. See the newly added cited book reference in the article which was published by ABC Clio. You can also see videos of this custom on YouTube and pinterest. It's not WP:MADEUP, and there is good merge target. @Bearian, Headhitter, Tooncool64, Oaktree b, Coeusin, Suonii180 what do you all think of this WP:ATD?4meter4 (talk) 17:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: To allow for consideration of new sources brought up after most comments were made in this discussion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 20:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC)- It's sourced to a cookbook, I don't consider that any sort of acceptable sourcing. Oaktree b (talk) 22:42, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed. Tooncool64 (talk) 01:29, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Also agree. Coeusin (talk) 11:30, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- It's sourced to a cookbook, I don't consider that any sort of acceptable sourcing. Oaktree b (talk) 22:42, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: This poorly sourced article does not meet WP:GNG.--DesiMoore (talk) 15:46, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete – Per above. Svartner (talk) 04:44, 21 November 2024 (UTC)