Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Genevieve Goings
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect, no notability established, no third-party sources. Pascal.Tesson (talk) 05:07, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Genevieve Goings (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Neutral - incompleted AfD nomination (note that I am not the nominator) – Tivedshambo (talk) 18:21, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tikiwont 12:01, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Close - There is no argument here to support deletion. Nominator left nary a clue. --Evb-wiki 13:11, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletions. -- the wub "?!" 14:32, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Ordinarily, I would say summarily close this as a failed nomination, but I think I can figure out that the nominator meant to suggest that this should be deleted as a minor musician whose article fails to make out a convincing case for notability. - Smerdis of Tlön 14:56, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - If deleted, it should be redirected to Choo-Choo Soul. --Evb-wiki 15:11, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect sounds like a good idea to me. If her solo efforts pan out, she may develop sufficient notability for a distinct article, but at the moment her notability seems connected with Choo Choo Soul. Reliable sources can, of course, prove me wrong. :) I haven't found any, though. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:24, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect - My first impression was why not keep it, but now I see that the article's been there long enough that someone with more information about her career has had a chance to add it. --Steve Foerster (talk) 13:09, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - minor musician whose article fails to make out a convincing case for notability. I am the nominator, accidentally failed to list reason. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Firefoxx111 (talk • contribs) 18:42, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.