Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geoff Antonio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The article's subject is found to not be notable. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 02:02, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Geoff Antonio

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advert from shill for non notable musician. There is a lack of coverage Antonio in independent reliable sources. No reviews, charting, awards. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:35, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Rahat (Message) 17:34, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:08, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience ^t 23:51, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Article and sources do not describe has he is notable as required by WP:GNG and WP:NMUSIC. Mattg82 (talk) 18:54, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Walton (talk) 00:03, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The article's subject clearly fails to satisfy any of the twelve criteria listed at WP:MUSICBIO. I was unable to find any significant coverage of him in any reputable source so I'll have to assume he doesn't meet our general notability guideline either. Iaritmioawp (talk) 00:47, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:MUSICBIO and WP:BASIC: little coverage in reliable sources, and the subject does not satisfy the other WP:MUSICBIO criteria. Esquivalience ^t 01:03, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.