Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georges Henri Issa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:41, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Georges Henri Issa

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The sole source in the article doesn't mention him, and the external links are not WP:RS. A search turned up nothing at all. Fails WP:NBIO. Narky Blert (talk) 12:51, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga (talk) 15:43, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Well, there are few links that turned up on a search. However, these are mirrors of Wikipedia or social media links. Any of them hardly meet WP:RS, and the subject fails GNG. KCVelaga (talk) 15:45, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 17:19, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment by nom. I should perhaps have said, a search turned up nothing WP:RS. I too found the social sites and mirrors. Narky Blert (talk) 04:47, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: An article originally from a WP:SPA and recently overwritten by horribly promotional text from an IP account. Perhaps this discussion should take as read that this earlier version will be reinstated and use that as the basis for considering notability? That said, the references in that article instance were very poor and, while the subject does appear in a list of names of Lebanese architects [1], I am not seeing the specific WP:RS coverage needed to establish biographical notability. AllyD (talk) 17:19, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment by nom. I fell across this article because of that recent WP:PEACOCK IP-user expansion, which had bluelinked just about every word of two or more syllables. I don't think we need look at the history of the page. Puffery in any article can be dealt with by third-party editing. That isn't the issue. The Wikipedia question is, after you have stripped out the puffery, is there anything left? Narky Blert (talk) 04:43, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:45, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I searched, but I can't source him. Fails WP:GNG, WP:BASIC.E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:19, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.