Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/German Londoño
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 20:39, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- German Londoño (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No information on the page, let alone an assertion of notability. --ANowlin: talk 17:04, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- There's more information in the history. Read the article's talk page. Uncle G (talk) 17:45, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colombia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:21, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:21, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:22, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- If there is a reason why the page should be kept, then it should be included in the article. All this is is a single sentence, with no references or assertion of notability. --ANowlin: talk 23:49, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment A search of Google news hits turns up articles and reviews in Spanish newspapers [1]. If anyone is more fluent in the language, perhaps they can ascertain whether there's enough there to support some notability; I suspect there is. JNW (talk) 01:11, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I suspect there may possibly be some notability there. But since when do we keep articles around just because there "may be some notability somewhere" but its not in the article? --ANowlin: talk 04:19, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- (EC) We don't, and with respect to your rationale for nominating, I didn't vote keep. But the Colombian newspapers appear to offer support. Perhaps someone with a better comprehension of Spanish than I possess can be helpful. JNW (talk) 04:30, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Update Using the supplied Google links, I've found nothing on the first 2-3 pages. No images what so ever. The only news articles talk about US people with the same name, and the article in Spanish is talking about a man receiving his sentence after being convicted of a crime. --ANowlin: talk 04:29, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- These [2], [3], [4] are articles, either in total or part, about the artist. And this, from a museum exhibition [5]. A resume that lists several museum shows: [6].JNW (talk) 04:32, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, my Spanish sucks, but Google Translate works pretty well. I'll mess with tomorrow. --ANowlin: talk 04:43, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- These [2], [3], [4] are articles, either in total or part, about the artist. And this, from a museum exhibition [5]. A resume that lists several museum shows: [6].JNW (talk) 04:32, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Update Using the supplied Google links, I've found nothing on the first 2-3 pages. No images what so ever. The only news articles talk about US people with the same name, and the article in Spanish is talking about a man receiving his sentence after being convicted of a crime. --ANowlin: talk 04:29, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, pending translation of sources Based on the exhibition history and articles in Colombian papers. This will need some assistance with translation. JNW (talk) 04:49, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Also listed in this book on Latin American artists. -- Whpq (talk) 20:05, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.