Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghost culture
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:55, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
neologism? (Requested by User:Adrift* on my talk page, may also break three pillars) Sceptre (Talk) 17:13, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Original research, not encyclopedic, mixing a whole bunch of anecdotal items that do not constitute a culture. Fan1967 18:02, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete For reasons above.--Adrift* 21:30, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with goth, condensed, and under a new subheading. It's a valid subcultural branch and the term "ghost" is commonly applied to its members, though it may not warrant its own entry just yet. Rob T Firefly 02:27, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Please cite examples. I have no problem with the article if there truly is a commonly applied membership. And I especially have no problem with a merger with the Goth scene. But as far as I can see, it's simply a neologism for group that does not truly exist. In fact, outside of the Chinese Ghost Culture (which maybe should have it's own article on Wikipedia) I can hardly find any articles on Google that point to a "Ghost Culture" in general.--Adrift* 07:35, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm familiar with the term and have known a number of people who used it, but of course that's not an encyclopedically verifiable source. Google doesn't bring much up which surprises me a bit, so I'll have to change my stance to Weak delete. Rob T Firefly 04:03, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Original research does not belong in Wikipedia Wangfoo 00:04, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.