Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghostory (video game)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 17:01, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
- Ghostory (video game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unnotable, most of the sources aren't RS (company's own FB, twitter, steam etc, not RS) Google news returns nothing of usefulness. L3X1 (distant write) 03:18, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete WP:CRYSTAL, advert. Cabayi (talk) 12:56, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 12:57, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 12:58, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 00:45, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 00:45, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 03:13, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947 03:13, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
- What kind of sources would we need to add in order for this to be classified as "notable"? (Chocolatejr9 (talk) 02:10, 27 March 2017 (UTC))
- What are the major game-reviewing websites? Have they reviewed this game, or are they going to do so? --Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:35, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
- I haven't found any reviews for the game, though I don't know if anyone has any plans to review it. If we were to delete the page now, would it be possible to bring it back once there are sources and such? Because if we could do that, it may be the best route for now. (Chocolatejr9 (talk) 02:40, 28 March 2017 (UTC))
- @Chocolatejr9: That is always an option. --Izno (talk) 02:02, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
- I haven't found any reviews for the game, though I don't know if anyone has any plans to review it. If we were to delete the page now, would it be possible to bring it back once there are sources and such? Because if we could do that, it may be the best route for now. (Chocolatejr9 (talk) 02:40, 28 March 2017 (UTC))
- What are the major game-reviewing websites? Have they reviewed this game, or are they going to do so? --Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:35, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:49, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete; the WP:VG/RS search pulls up nothing, indicating a lack of notability in third party reliable sources. --Izno (talk) 02:02, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - doesn't meet WP:GNG. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 00:04, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.