Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghulam Mohey-ud-din (economist)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. czar ⨹ 19:43, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ghulam Mohey-ud-din (economist)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This appears to be a resume with no indication of notability. I'm amazed the article has been around for three years. ... discospinster _talk 13:57, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:07, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:07, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:07, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete under CSD#A7 as the article only asserts profession, not notability even without refs. And wow. --lTopGunl (talk) 16:25, 11 December nom2014 (UTC)
delete as per nom. SamuelTheGhost (talk) 23:07, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Obviously, no evidence of notability. Wikicology (talk) 23:16, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No evidence of notability, and seems like an attempt at self-promotion. Vanamonde93 (talk) 13:38, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -Apparently created by a SPA, subject lacking significant coverage in multiple secondary, independent and reliable sources doesn't merit a Wikipedia article and qualifies for deletion. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 16:24, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Looks like a cheap advertisement to me. Fai zan 17:14, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Seems to be a self bio - nothing in there that's actually asserting notability outside of the accomplishments bit Dusti ^{*Let's talk!*} 20:18, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete since it looks like non-notable self-promotion.--TMD Talk Page. 18:22, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.