Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gilberto Vendemiati

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:24, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gilberto Vendemiati

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG due to lack of sources available on the person. I don't think this counts, but it's the best I could find. SWinxy (talk) 23:05, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Cycling, and Italy. SWinxy (talk) 23:05, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep absolutely Gimondi'a domestique at Salvarani, well known in Italy. In addition to that beautiful article linked by the author of the deletion proposal (other that doesn't count is very detailed), there are many others and many cards / profiles in the various cycling databases. Absolutely more important than hundreds and hundreds of pages of domestiques, present on Wikipedia, and of which no one would dream of requesting the cancellation. --Kasper2006 (talk) 03:54, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
"Well known" is not our guideline on notability, nor is the amount of databases a person is in. WP:N is. SWinxy (talk) 04:03, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I have expanded the article and added additional sources and information. The source you listed definitely counts, it is from a prominent Italian newspaper and centers on Vendemiati himself, rather than a passing mention. He also does meet WP:NCYCLING. Seacactus 13 (talk) 23:53, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Which part of NCYCLING? (And GNG should still be established even for sports notability.) SWinxy (talk) 02:10, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: for more policy based input
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 00:38, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting after new article additions.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:46, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment probably is famous, but we need sources. [1] from an Italian museum. That's about the best I can find. Oaktree b (talk) 01:03, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.