Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glena Avila

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Glena (film). (non-admin closure) –Davey2010 • (talk) 14:21, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Glena Avila

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable MMA fighter - does not come close to meeting WP:MMANOT Peter Rehse (talk) 09:27, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 09:27, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Glena (film) Obviously not notable as an MMA fighter, but being the subject of a documentary is different.Mdtemp (talk) 18:52, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:51, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:51, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per Mdtemp's comment above. Non-notable MMA fighter. The existence of the documentary film makes this easy, even if the subject were marginally notable. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 23:57, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect It's clear that her notability is tied to the film and that she wouldn't be considered notable without it. Papaursa (talk) 18:36, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.