Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Metal
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 02:45, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Global Metal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable documentary, no sources ≈ The Haunted Angel 12:29, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep and rewrite I believe this passes WP:MOVIE. There appears to be notability here in news articles (1, 2, 3, 4). Though there isn't much else, and little to nothing outside of Canada. Lexis-Nexis isn't any help either. As to the article itself, that last sentence of the lead section has got to change; it's written in a very promotional tone. --/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 12:47, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Mendaliv. There is sufficient independent coverage from reliable sources for Global Metal to pass the film notability guidelines. Now, there are sufficient sources on the article to make it viable. Poor writing on its own is not an indicator of non-notability. -- The_socialist talk? 01:09, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- --/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 12:48, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- --/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 12:48, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.