Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Solid State Lighting Outlook

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 04:05, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Global Solid State Lighting Outlook

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously PRODed. An article created to list what appears to be the agenda of an organization which in itself would probably fail WP:ORG. I believe this is an attempt at promotion of the website, but regardless of that, this fails WP:NOTDIR and/or WP:NOTJOURNAL. §FreeRangeFrog 20:05, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete. Little to no meaningful content. Mkdw ^talk 20:54, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per WP:OR (and a lot of other criteria for deletion). --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 23:55, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

this GSO is essentially the same to the GEO(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Environment_Outlook) and WEO(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Energy_Outlook), which are both listed on Wikipedia and served the function of letting the public know the comprehensive knowledge on that specific field. If you allow the GEO and WEO mentioned before, the GSO should also be allowed and listed here as well. Ledprofessional (talk) 12:36, 11 December 2012 (UTC) — Ledprofessional (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Please see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 19:32, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If those are also filled with nothing but WP:OR, they should be marked for AfD as well. --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 02:09, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please see here, in this link (http://www.isa-world.org/photoview.aspx?t=6&w=26&id=199) of the official website of the Non-profit Org of the SSL industry, from the first photo of the second row, you can see the spokesman who is holding the Book of GSO in his left hand, which proves the GSO is coming from previously published information and a reliable source. This link was just found so it's not in the references at the beginning. Ledprofessional (talk)

Ledprofessional (talk) 13:13, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:45, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:45, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

：This is not literature-related or business-related, it's knowledge that the public needs to konw on the specific field of Lighting options. Ledprofessional (talk) 03:46, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No evidence provided that the outlook is a notable publication—there are no mentions of it in secondary sources cited. —C.Fred (talk) 04:04, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.