Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GnuGet
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 18:12, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- GnuGet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Contested ProD. I don't think it's notable, and a quick google search for reliable sources seems to agree. Plus, it's a stupid pun :p. Paragon12321 05:48, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- GnuGet is in reference to Nuggets, as in chicken or gold, not nougat the confectionery Cyko 01 (talk) 23:05, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Here can be found a source: http://shareazasecurity.be/forum/viewforum.php?f=56
- Take a quick look at WP:RS. Sources need to be reliable. A forum doesn't count. Paragon12321 15:44, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- it is a relatively new program and there hasn't even been a real release yet, so no there are not any reliable sources or articles about the software. Cyko 01 (talk) 22:17, 14 August 2008 (UTC) (I am the one who created the project)[reply]
- Reliable sources are the main standard for notability. If there aren't any sources to be found, it probably shouldn't have an article. Paragon12321 01:46, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Since the project is under development, there should be other sources soon. Also, the article will probably be expanded in the near future... Let's wait for a while if there are notable changes to sources and project status before deleting it. mfg Old Death (talk) 09:43, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Reliable sources are the main standard for notability. If there aren't any sources to be found, it probably shouldn't have an article. Paragon12321 01:46, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- it is a relatively new program and there hasn't even been a real release yet, so no there are not any reliable sources or articles about the software. Cyko 01 (talk) 22:17, 14 August 2008 (UTC) (I am the one who created the project)[reply]
- Take a quick look at WP:RS. Sources need to be reliable. A forum doesn't count. Paragon12321 15:44, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.