Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Go-Slow Lagos
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 04:12, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- Go-Slow Lagos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article is about an unnoteworthy topic, poorly formatted, unencyclopedic, and provides little to no information of value. EvergreenFir (talk) 20:49, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. No decent content there; if someone does want to write on the topic, they can easily begin by including it at Traffic congestion#By_country or Lagos, Nigeria#Transportation. --Atethnekos (Discussion, Contributions) 21:39, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Poorly sourced. And even if traffic congestion is particularly notable in Lagos, Nigeria to the extent that it warrants its own article -- and there's no reason given that it is from the lack of information provide -- the article seems to be mostly about a term for the traffic congestion, not the traffic congestion itself. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 22:05, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:57, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:57, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.