Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Godzilla Generations: Maximum Impact
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Cirt (talk) 00:40, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Godzilla Generations: Maximum Impact (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
non notable software, prod removed. WuhWuzDat 16:22, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The article is in terrible shape, but the game was from a major publisher for a major console and that gives it notability. TJ Spyke 17:00, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment...so, if a "major publisher", makes a game for a "major console", that sells a sum total of 3 copies, and nobody ever hears of it..it's notable? Notability is NOT inherited.WuhWuzDat 15:23, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. TJ Spyke 17:04, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Godzilla Generations, which is what I thought this game was when looking for sources. Nifboy (talk) 19:53, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep IGN review present in the article is a good source, there's some info here on allgame. In addition, a lot of DC reviews and features remain locked in magazines which haven't been added to databases, it doesn't mean the information isn't there. There is enough to pull together a basic article (and I'd know, I did last time with the first game). Someoneanother 20:44, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep – notability easily established here, despite the clear User:Mcjakeqcool-type editing. –MuZemike 22:00, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I added the allgame source, cleaned the language, and added a stub tag. Agree, there are probably more sources out there; I'll see if I can track some down later. For now, I think we have the bare minimum for a stub. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 15:31, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Hello, i have this game and added a few informations about the gameplay, however since it comes from my own experience with this game i cant refer to other sites. hope it still helps a little bit GBK2010 (talk) 13:58, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment, There are dust bunnies under my bed, but my "ownership" of them, and my opinion, do nothing to prove their notability. WuhWuzDat 15:20, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment heh. of course ^^ and where is the source of your thesis that the earth is round, they asked galileo. jokes aside. i just added a few facts bout this game..that it is halfway a railshooter more or less and the other half you fight against monsters from old godzilla movies one on one. i guess it wont but would screenshots i make from these levels which show exactly the gameplay i describe count as source? :) GBK2010 (talk) 15:44, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.