Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goln

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Phroziac^(talk) 23:40, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Goln

Non-notable fictional universe. "Several novels have been published" actually turns out to be one published by a vanity press (iUniverse). That lone book has an Amazon.com rank of 'None' and there is a single gushing review that smells like a sock. Al 00:28, 27 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as vanity and pseudo-hoax, then. - A Man In Black (Talk | Contribs) 00:32, 27 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. Dlyons493 Talk 00:38, 27 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. Jwissick ^(t)^(c) 00:44, 27 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. DirectorStratton 02:30, 27 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. Pureblade 02:58, 27 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn ≈ jossi ≈ 03:12, 27 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, websites have no Alexa rank and searching for Goln+fantasy gets me 501 Googles, none of which appear to be a reputable source but mere advertising by the creator(s). - Mgm|^(talk) 08:22, 27 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 00:08, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.