Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greenwood Dale School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 04:41, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Greenwood Dale School

I Wish to withdraw this AFD pleaseMrmccollough 11:43, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An article on a single school is not encyclopedic Mrmccollough 10:46, 29 October 2007 (UTC) DELETE: Absolutely, since when are articles on single schools encyclopedic, A seperate aricle on Barry Day would be better...Mrmccollough 10:45, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep - a meritless nomination; articles on single schools are perfectly proper for Wikipedia. This is a clearly notable school that is sourced as outstanding both academically and in sport. It is an exceptional turnaround story and is now a Leading Edge school and a National Support School. It has more than enough references to easily pass WP:N. TerriersFan 10:55, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

comment: I understand and agree now, however the page needs severe cleanup and sources to back info...Mrmccollough 11:33, 29 October 2007 (UTC) PS: how do you withdraw an AFD???Mrmccollough 11:33, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Everything in the article is sourced. To withdraw the nomination put <s> before and </s> after your nomination and then add "Nomination withdrawn" with signature. TerriersFan 11:45, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.