Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Newell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 12:58, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Greg Newell

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

University american football player, no professional play. Gigs (talk) 02:21, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails WP:NGRIDIRON on lack of pro play. All cited awards appear to be FSU team awards. Faustus37 (talk) 04:12, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for failing WP:ATHLETE and WP:NGRIDIRON. Qworty (talk) 10:19, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:11, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:11, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not seem to have the coverage that WP:GNG requires, and I cannot find any other avenue to notability.--Paul McDonald (talk) 18:09, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Subject does not satisfy the SNG guidelines of either WP:NCOLLATH or WP:NGRIDIRON, and is therefore not entitled to a presumption of notability and must satisfy the general notability guidelines for inclusion per WP:GNG. My Google search turns up dozens, if not hundreds of hits, but that doesn't settle the issue, either. None of the 80+ hits that I reviewed provided substantial, non-trivial, non-routine coverage in independent reliable sources per WP:GNG and WP:RS. (please note that fan blogs don't count as independent, reliable sources for purposes of establishing notability.) Based on my search, if this subject is notable, then virtually every letterman on a BCS college football team would likewise be notable. That's a bridge too far. If someone else turns up multiple examples of non-trivial, non-routine coverage of the subject in indepedent reliable sources, I would reconsider my !vote. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 01:17, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep this meets the criteria and guidelines for WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG.Gregoryat (talk) 20:09, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Query How? Please provide sources and exaamples.--Paul McDonald (talk) 23:03, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Closing admin: Gregoryat is currently blocked for AfD abuse ~~and also has a history of conflict with Dirtlawyer1~~. Gigs (talk) 00:52, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.