Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gregory Pontrelli
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 13:39, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
- Gregory Pontrelli (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No significant coverage of the person (likely neither of the company, but that hasn't been tried yet). Apparently good for soundbites in interviews, which the majority of the given sources pertains to, but I doubt that constitutes notability. (However, feel free to tell me otherwise,BLP notability is not my forte) Elmidae (talk · contribs) 16:53, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Looks to be self-promotional/conflict of interest: Seems the creator of the article was also the creator of Lausanne Business Solutions, whose president appears to be Pontrelli. Eric talk 18:34, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
- delete lacks sufficient coverage in RS to meet notability requirements. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 23:35, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Babymissfortune 01:42, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Babymissfortune 01:44, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Babymissfortune 01:45, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Babymissfortune 01:45, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Babymissfortune 01:45, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete- it's a puff-piece. ‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ 15:40, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - Basically per everybody else; it is a promotional article whose subject doesn't have enough in-depth coverage in reliable sources, meaning that the content of the article cannot be adequately verified. RileyBugz会話投稿記録 04:16, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.