Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grey Wolf Optimizer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 10:28, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Grey Wolf Optimizer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete, appears to be written by someone connected to the software, does not appear to be a notable software at this time. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 02:22, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:51, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:51, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment "Mirjalili et al. in 2014" kind of gives it away, as does the username. Alimirjalili, however, please don't be dissuaded, and know that specialised writers are the lifeblood of Wikipedia. I'm sure that at least some of this material has a place in some other article, but don't know what that article is. James^x12345 21:21, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Promotion of a recently published academic project. No independent coverage. Someone not using his real name (talk) 01:49, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, moderately interesting, but it pretty much all seems to be based on a single paper by Mirjalili. I couldn't find any other substantial coverage of the software or the paper that might indicate notability.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.