Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Griffin Technology (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 12:15, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Griffin Technology

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Launching AFD for Zigzig20s, who should put in the reason. Nat Gertler (talk) 15:59, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fails to pass GNG. The article is mostly unreferenced. The company was acquired by the Incipio Group in 2016, with only 150 employees.Zigzig20s (talk) 16:03, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 07:38, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 07:38, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:16, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:32, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:32, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: does not meet WP:NCORP & significant RS coverage not found. It's possible that Griffin PowerMate is not notable either. Both seem to be promotionalism only. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:39, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- seemingly run of the mill company that fails WP:NCORP and most glaringly WP:CORPDEPTH due to a lack of in-depth coverage. Note that the first AfD hinged on a propsal to re-write that article, but that was carried out before NCORP was significantly strengthened. Prognosis is not good (in my mind) for this article.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.