Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gypsy moth Republican
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Republican In Name Only. (non-admin closure) LlamaAl (talk) 00:07, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Gypsy moth Republican (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A political slang term that doesn't really have any use in political discourse. A synonym for RINO, it's basically a neologism from the 1980s. See NEO. GrapedApe (talk) 01:45, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:18, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Conservatism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:18, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:18, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. It's probably worth a sentence at Republican In Name Only, but without any real refs, I won't say merge. --BDD (talk) 22:14, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Republican In Name Only; no verified content to reliable sources. Redirect per WP:COMMONNAME.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 16:28, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Republican In Name Only per RightCowLeftCoast. Fails WP:GNG & WP:NEO.--JayJasper (talk) 21:43, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect per above and WP:CHEAP. Bearian (talk) 00:21, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.