Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hélène Gosselin
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:37, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Hélène Gosselin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:BLP of a retired government bureaucrat, not properly sourced as passing our inclusion criteria for non-elected government officials. There are no "inherently" notable roles listed here for the purposes of exempting her from having to pass WP:GNG on her sourceability -- but the only "referencing" present here at all is her "staff" profiles on the self-published websites of the government departments she used to work for, which are not notability-building sourcing.
As always, the notability test for civil servants is not "can be verified as existing", it's "has received a significant volume of GNG-worthy media coverage about her work to establish its significance", and there's no evidence of that being shown here. Bearcat (talk) 12:52, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Canada. Bearcat (talk) 12:52, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete I as surprised how common this name is but I can’t see in depth coverage in RIS for this person. Mccapra (talk) 17:29, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete we clearly do not have enough sourcing to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:17, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.