Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HAT-P-15b

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 18:40, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

HAT-P-15b

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails all WP:NASTCRIT criteria. One discovery paper, no popular coverage, and the usual database entries. Lithopsian (talk) 19:32, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages for the same reasons:

Lithopsian (talk) 19:35, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 08:58, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Merge. All the articles are nothing more than values that belong in a list. The entries I notice would be worth preserving are RA and DEC; the lists of planets don't seem to include any way of locating the objects.

Agree with deletion for all of the above HAT-P objects. Basic data for these objects is available in SIMBAD and other catalogs, and there's no need for Wikipedia to simply duplicate these basic data listings if there's no other noteworthy information about the object. Aldebarium (talk) 21:09, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.