Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HD Brows

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 19:51, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

HD Brows

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Covert advertising of a non-notable company. The best I could do in terms of sourcing is [1] (not a reliable source) and [2][3] (both stink of native advertising). MER-C 13:27, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

delete this is an advertisement. Jytdog (talk) 13:43, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 15:05, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 15:05, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment:Coast123 (talk · contribs) has been banned for being a promotional account. He has added a couple of HD Brow links into various articles. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 15:07, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 15:12, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Article tagged as WP:G5 and WP:G11 --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 15:18, 9 July 2018 (UTC)request denied by TonyBallioni (talk · contribs) who said "not a sock, and an admin thought AfD was better than CSD so I'm deferring to his judgement" --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 14:52, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'm inlined to say delete as it was created by a blocked sock who had spammed Wikipedia with links to the HD Brows website. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk to me • ✍️ Contributions) 14:52, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable or well-sourced. Did a good job on my eyebrows though......The joy of all things (talk) 22:26, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Although it won an award, it doesn't meet the criteria for establishing notability. References fail WP:ORGIND. Topic therefore fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 12:06, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.