Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hack Job
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:41, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Hack Job (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable independent film with no verifiable reviews. Donaldd23 (talk) 12:29, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 12:29, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
- Delete article totally lacks adequate sourcing to pass GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:55, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.