Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Han–Xiongnu War (215 BC–200 BC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 14:46, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Han–Xiongnu War (215 BC–200 BC)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fail to see how this is notable, can't find any WP:RS on this "Han–Xiongnu War (215 BC–200 BC)". The creator of this article basically copied the stuff they were reverted (and blocked) for at Battle of Baideng here. They've misused tons of citations here [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9], and recently engaged in copyvio in another article [10], which may also be the case here. Most of the citations left are unverifiable (which is very convenient, I can't look for further violations) and doesn't strike me as WP:RS. HistoryofIran (talk) 21:30, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is also likely sock/meat puppetry involved here per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hunnic Enjoyer. Two brand new users have attempted to remove the AFD template so far. HistoryofIran (talk) 14:05, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events, History, Military, and China. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:44, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:16, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I'd like to hear more opinions in this AFD.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:21, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wikipedia seems to be attracting ever more of this battlebollox, with users inventing or embellishing actual events. It is remotely possible that there are passing mentions in the alleged sources that have been strung together to create this article, but it has all the telltale signs of a fake. Excellent nomination. Mccapra (talk) 05:50, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a mess of WP:SYNTH. Good catch. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:41, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.