Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harmathèque

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn by nominator Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 10:02, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Harmathèque

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seemingly NN website/company with no coverage I've been able to find to meet WP:CORP or even WP:GNG. Lots of individual references to the site, but nothing about the web site or company to pass the bar. Failed CSD for reasons that are not clear. Toddst1 (talk) 23:28, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:38, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:38, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:38, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Ridiculous, this was even a subscription with the Wiki Library. "A number of major educational institutions have a subscription to site, " should make it notable in itself.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:04, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep. A bizarre nomination. The first page of a Google search gives [1], [2] and [3], reliable and independent sources that discuss the subject in depth. Perhaps the nominator was restricting the search to English language sources? French sources are just as valid in establishing notability. Aymatth2 (talk) 12:18, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per Aymatth2. --Rosiestep (talk) 16:12, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
WITHDRAW: by nom per links brought forth. Who subscribes is irrelevant, however. Toddst1 (talk) 17:45, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.