Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harney Street

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 03:33, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Harney Street

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a non-notable street that doesn't appear to pass WP:GNG. (Contested PROD) Imzadi 1979 → 00:30, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Imzadi 1979 → 00:30, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nebraska-related deletion discussions. Imzadi 1979 → 00:30, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Yet another WP:RUNOFTHEMILL city street in Omaha. Not passing GNG, not even a numbered route to redirect to. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 08:12, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable enough to merit an article on Wikipedia.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:35, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:GNG. Not notable. --Kemalcan (talk) 17:48, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:24, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per all above. Smartyllama (talk) 15:28, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.