Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harris Nadar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:27, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Harris Nadar

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Harris Nadar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is nothing showing that Nadar was a notable enough businessman to merit an article. The only source we have here is attributed to his company, and in fact that article was a verbatim repeat of what seems to be a press relase, complete with unencyclopdic language and a style inconsistent with our manual of style, until I edited it a few minutes ago. I was not able to find any additional sources about him, just a facebook page and a few similar sources on his company. Nothing at all indicates a passing of any of our inclusion criteria John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:22, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and India. Shellwood (talk) 15:27, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
• Speedy delete Delete: Straight copyvio: report Reverse copying actually so not copyvio, still unnotable per nom. Bsoyka (talk · contribs) 18:03, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
• Delete. My search in English, Hindi, and Tamil found no coverage of Nadar at all. Unless there are non-English sources that I'm missing, Nadar seems to fail our notability guidelines by a wide margin. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:12, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.