Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harrison King

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. There is consensus that this currently doesn't pass GNG. As there is no indication when this might change, I see no good reason to draftify. If and when this meets GNG in future, the current article can be restored by any admin Randykitty (talk) 09:01, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Harrison King

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A web search finds passing mentions but no WP:SIGCOV. The article fails WP:GNG. Robby.is.on (talk) 08:59, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Robby.is.on (talk) 08:59, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and England. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:39, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:45, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 09:17, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Professional footballer who played 34 games in the 2022–23 season.--Echetus Xe 12:49, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

30 of those appearances were in the non-professional seventh tier of English football. But it's irrelevant, what counts is whether the article meets WP:GNG. Robby.is.on (talk) 12:56, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify, player just made his debut in a highly covered league.--Ortizesp (talk) 05:05, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify - doesn't yet have WP:SIGCOV from independent sources Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:43, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 20:17, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.