Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Shapiro (author)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 02:34, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Shapiro (author)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has Copied-and-pasted text from: http://www.uknscc.org/2005_uknscc/speakers/shapiro_pringle.html . It has had a little bit omited, but the article is not in the own persons words. Please help improve or delete this article RedBlue82 ^talk 21:00, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as article fails notability criteria for authors. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 09:34, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Very sloppy article construction, as no WP:RS are cited. EnabledDanger (talk) 20:49, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete doesn't pass WP:AUTHOR. Spatulli (talk) 21:16, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:01, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I started expanding the article properly to show all his publications, which are in hundreds of libraries, and some of the reviews they have received. --his book on Hendrix, for example, was reviewd by both Rolling Stone and The Economist--among others. This is a typical carelessly written article that inadequately shows the notability, and where the nom hasn't checked. Good practice, when it's indicated that someone has written a book, is to try WorldCat, which typically either shows all his books, & some of the reviews, or proves he's self-published or unpublished, and thus settles the issue one way or another. DGG ( talk ) 02:45, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Agree with DGG. Poorly written article, as of now, but the guy's books are widely avaible and covered, and he seems to meet WP:AUTHOR. Vrivers (talk) 11:14, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thanks to DGG the article now shows his notability. His major book went into a second edition and was translated into Chinese; multiple reviews in Reliable Sources. --MelanieN (talk) 20:07, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 14:03, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep - Terrible stub article but adequate career achievement to merit inclusion, in my opinion. Carrite (talk) 16:36, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per DGG. Edward321 (talk) 13:48, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.