Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haruehun Airry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The nomination doesn't make sense and the nominator didn't make a valid reason/argument for deletion. This nomination is being closed as a keep with no prejudice against a speedy renomination that is coherent and logically sound. (non-admin closure) Dusti ^{*Let's talk!*} 02:50, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Haruehun Airry

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reason Evrdkmkm (talk) 00:58, 5 May 2019 (UTC) this person is notable, too short article, unsourced and unclear texts in this article. /the ref. that they're add like the ref. maybe it's fake links and not available.--Evrdkmkm (talk) 00:58, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2019 May 5. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:11, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 01:29, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 01:30, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. An earlier version of this article at https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Haruehun_Airry&oldid=838057241 is more complete and has more references. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 01:34, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
all the ref. that they added in the article maybe it's fake because it's all dead links and some link it's Thai Red Cross Org. website and news didnt talked about Haruehun on website/news. so we dont have his article in Thai too because he is notable, he just was viral on Thai social by his work about sexy male model pics.--Evrdkmkm (talk) 01:46, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- We don't remove links for being dead. Instead, we ask User:InternetArchiveBot to look for and add a ink to an archived copy of the dead link on a site like Internet Archive, or we do it ourselves. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:28, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

he is notable if he is famous in Thailand or Asia he will still have his article on Thai wiki and they will not removed from Thai wiki. so his fans knows him only on his social media like FB and IG.--Evrdkmkm (talk) 12:18, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: The above comment probably misunderstood the meaning of the word notable, and meant the opposite. I've removed extra bold text. --Paul_012 (talk) 08:18, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment He seems to be moderately notable, with some amount of online coverage. However the most of references cited in the article are of poor quality, like [1] which only described a project but failed to show his involvement in the project. --Lerdsuwa (talk) 17:50, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Scott Burley (talk) 06:37, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The cited BK magazine interview is rather brief. Lots of mention on the web, but the only in-depth Thai sources I could find are this article from Adam's Love[2] (which isn't independent of the subject), and this one from Post Today[3]. Has appeared on some talk shows with Bright TV[4][5] --Paul_012 (talk) 06:36, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The amount of recent coverage of his field alone is enough to satisfy the WP:GNG. MyanmarBBQ (talk) 05:36, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:14, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Incoherent nomination and sufficient sources identified. Mccapra (talk) 11:18, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. He seems to be a notable person, but to complete passes notability needs to add some reliable sources.--MA Javadi (talk) 11:42, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.