Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hazard High School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep per WP:HEY and WP:N (non-admin closure). SeanMD80^{talk | contribs} 21:16, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hazard High School

Article does not indicate the significance or importance of the school. VivioFateFan ^{(Talk, Sandbox)} 02:32, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. Lacks claims to noability or sources to back up such claims. I'd like to see the article given a little time, though, as it was just created today. A PROD might've been more appropriate. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 03:05, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —JERRY ^talk _contribs 03:23, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete with no prejudice against recreation.Keep Generally speaking, all high schools are notable, but they should be more than a mere directory listing. ~~If an editor significantly improves this article during the AFD, by adding substantial content I'll probably change my !vote.~~Changed !vote by my reasoning listed originally JERRY ^talk _contribs 06:03, 11 January 2008 (UTC) JERRY ^talk _contribs 03:34, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable basketball program, among other things. I've added a few refs to the article, and I'll add some more soon. Zagalejo^^^ 05:10, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
~~Weak keep~~ Keep. I was originally going to !vote "weak delete", buy my vote got edit conflicted by Zagalejo's post aove. The refs added are a good start (although it would be nice if those basketball players could be bluelinked), and given that the article's only a couple days old I'm willing to give it a little time to grow even with more sources coming in. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 05:12, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Ample reliable and verifiable sources establish Wikipedia:Notability. Alansohn (talk) 07:19, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for now, ie until we change policy on high-schools entirely: this is as good as the high-schools articles could expect to be now. Greswik (talk) 11:05, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Zagalego, who has substantially improved the article. Important history has happened there as included and cited. There's more to be added about the school's academic progress over the years. • Gene93k (talk) 11:25, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per improvements. Bearian'sBooties (talk) 19:15, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.